We’ve scanned the web to bring together a library of interesting, thought-provoking articles, blogs, reports and academic papers that explore the issue of genetic engineering in food and farming from broader and deeper perspectives. Browse for inspiration or search by theme.

Currently showing only Legislation & Regulation Resources
Page 1 of 6

Genetically Modified Microorganisms: Risks and Regulatory Considerations for Human and Environmental Health

Publication date: 14/02/2026

While beneficial applications exist, GMMs may pose unique, long-term risks to human and environmental health due to their biologically active, self-replicating nature and capacity for mutation and dispersal. Current regulatory frameworks remain fragmented, with no coordinated international policy.

This review highlights key risks, including horizontal gene transfer, disruption of human microbiomes, and the emergence of “super bugs” or impacts on soil carbon cycles. Engineered microbial enzymes may also contribute to autoimmunity.

Given limited understanding of microbial ecology, the authors propose a biosafety workflow with pre-release risk assessment and post-release monitoring, and call for stronger use of the precautionary principle in regulation.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Emerging governance considerations for the deployment of genetically engineered microbes

Publication date: 01/02/2026

This review examines emerging trends in the governance and policy landscape for real-world deployment of genetically engineered microbes (GEMs) in the United States and Europe. A recent wave of commercialized GEMs in the US suggests renewed interest in open release after decades of low activity, with applications spanning agriculture, environmental restoration, energy, and health.

These developments challenge existing governance frameworks in several ways. The feasibility of strict product- or process-based regulation is increasingly tested, while the long-term persistence and ecological action of GEMs complicate traditional risk assessment approaches. Synergistic and indirect impacts are difficult to predict, requiring methods that can address high levels of uncertainty.

At the same time, diverse applications and new business models—such as direct-to-consumer approaches—raise concerns around stewardship, consent, transborder movement, and monitoring. Addressing these issues will require interdisciplinary research and broader stakeholder deliberation to support more robust and adaptable governance.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Governing by imaginaries? Regulatory legitimization of genome-edited foods in Japan

Publication date: 23/12/2025

The article examines how Japanese regulators construct legitimacy around genome-edited foods by shaping dominant sociotechnical imaginaries through strategies like selective incorporation, technocratic reinterpretation, and deferral, which tend to depoliticize societal concerns. While governance is presented as scientifically sound and procedurally transparent, public responses express alternative views based on precaution, social inclusion, and consumer rights, revealing ongoing tensions between innovation goals and demands for democratic legitimacy, and showing that this apparent stability is still fragile and contested.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Chimera: The Genetic Modification of Nature

Publication date: 01/09/2025

This briefing summarises concerns about the genetic modification of nature, which involves the use of genetic engineering (including gene editing) to create genetically modified organisms (GMOs) for release into the wild. It is written to draw the attention of members of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to serious problems associated with plans to develop the use of so-called synthetic biology in nature conservation.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Suitability of Real-Time PCR Methods for New Genomic Technique Detection in the Context of the European Regulations: A Case Study in Arabidopsis

Publication date: 02/04/2025

PCR methods are widely applied for the detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Europe, facilitating compliance with stringent regulatory requirements and enabling the accurate identification and quantification of genetically modified traits in various crops and foodstuffs. This manuscript investigates the suitability of real-time PCR methods for detecting organisms generated through new genomic techniques (NGTs), specifically focusing on a case study using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model gene-edited plant. The results demonstrate that while the grf1-3 LNA method successfully detected and quantified gene-edited Arabidopsis DNA, achieving absolute specificity remains a challenge. This study also addresses the significance of the cross-laboratory method for validation, demonstrating that the method developed for an SNP-modified allele can be performed in accordance with the precision and trueness criteria established by the European Network of GMO Laboratories (ENGL). Furthermore, we call for continued collaboration among regulatory agencies, academia, and industry stakeholders to refine detection strategies. This proactive approach is essential not only for regulatory compliance but also for maintaining public trust in the safe integration of gene-edited organisms into food products.

Resource type: article: Web Page

The Gene Editing Business: Rent Extraction in the Biotech Industry

Publication date: 24/10/2024

This article analyses the mechanisms governing the extraction, circulation, and distribution of rent in the biotech industry. Building on recent scholarship, it contributes to debates surrounding the importance of rent in technoscientific capitalism. It analyses genome editing as a global labour process. It interrogates how CRISPR technologies cement and expand neocolonial geographies of rent extraction, privatising the economic benefits and socialising the ecological risks. It argues that an increasingly monopolistic corporate biopower mediates how genome editing technologies are developed, and which mutant ecologies are socially produced.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Socio-economic assessment and genetically engineered crops in Africa: Building knowledge for development?

Publication date: 01/09/2024

How could we know if agricultural development interventions make contributions to sustainable development goals (SDGs)? Genetically engineered (GE) crops are celebrated as a class of technological interventions that can realize multiple SDGs. But recent studies have revealed the gap between GE crop program goals and the approaches used to assess their impacts. Using four comprehensive reviews of GE crop socio-economic impacts, we identify common shortcomings across three themes: (a) scope, (b) approaches and (c) heterogeneity. We find that the evaluation sciences literature offers alternative assessment approaches that can enable evaluators to better assess impacts, and inform learning and decision-making. We recommend the use of methods that enable evaluations to look beyond the agronomic and productive effects of individual traits to understand wider socio-economic effects.

Resource type: article: Web Page

A perspective from the EU: unintended genetic changes in plants caused by NGT—their relevance for a comprehensive molecular characterisation and risk assessment

Publication date: 27/10/2023

The review concludes that unintended genetic changes caused by NGT processes are relevant to risk assessment. Due to the technical characteristics of NGTs, the sites of the unintended changes, their genomic context and their frequency (in regard to specific sites) mean that the resulting gene combinations (intended or unintended) may be unlikely to occur with conventional methods. This, in turn, implies that the biological effects (phenotypes) can also be different and may cause risks to health and the environment. Therefore, we conclude that the assessment of intended as well as unintended genetic changes should be part of a mandatory comprehensive molecular characterisation and risk assessment of NGT plants that are meant for environmental releases or for market authorisation.

Resource type: article: Web Page

The EU legislative framework for a sustainable food system: How can it effectively deliver for the environment and people?

Publication date: 08/09/2023

In its Farm to Fork Strategy, the European Commission announced that it will present a legislative framework for a sustainable food system, an initiative expected for the third quarter of 2023.

The vision reflected in the law proposal will have a critical impact on the EU’s capacity to build its resilience against the worsening climate and biodiversity crises while guaranteeing long-term accessibility to healthy food.

The briefing presents solutions in the form of actionable tools that can best ensure the swift implementation of a sustainable EU food system on the ground. The European Commission must go ahead with its proposal and publish it in September 2023; there is no better time.

Resource type: article: Web Page