We’ve scanned the web to bring together a library of interesting, thought-provoking articles, blogs, reports and academic papers that explore the issue of genetic engineering in food and farming from broader and deeper perspectives. Browse for inspiration or search by theme.

Scientific critique of the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023, the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations 2025, and the corresponding ACRE and FSA guidance documents

Publication date: 30/03/2026

The document provides a scientific commentary and critique of:
• The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023, the primary legislation on which the secondary legislation, the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations 2025 and the relevant guidance documents are based
• “ACRE [Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment] guidance on producing precision bred plants” of 13 November 2025 (hereinafter called the “ACRE guidance document”),1 which relates to the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023 and the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations 2025.
• The UK Food Standards Agency’s (FSA’s) “Technical guidance to applicants for the authorisation of Precision Bred Organisms for food and feed”, of December 2025.
• The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations 2025 (hereinafter called “the 2025 Regulations”

Resource type: article: Web Page

Comparative biology and morphometrics of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) on Bt cotton and alternate malvaceous hosts

Publication date: 07/03/2026

This study compared how pink bollworm develops on Bt cotton and three other host plants (Abutilon indicum, Abutilon hirtum, and Abelmoschous ficulneus). Egg hatching time was similar across all plants. However, larvae, pupae, and adults lived longer and grew larger on Bt cotton, although their development was slower. This is likely because feeding on Bt cotton causes stress, which delays growth but allows the insects to feed for longer and gain more weight. In contrast, development on the other plants was faster but resulted in smaller, less developed insects. The results also show that pink bollworm can complete its life cycle on these alternative plants, which may help it survive between cotton growing seasons. This has important implications for managing this pest in cotton farming.

Resource type: article: Web Page

“Taking farmers’ trust issues seriously”: Mistrust and the digital tech revolution in water management

Publication date: 01/03/2026

This article examines farmers’ scepticism toward digital irrigation technologies in Spain, using qualitative research from Andalusia and Catalunya to explore layered forms of mistrust shaping adoption. Rather than treating mistrust as a barrier, it is reconceptualised as a diagnostic lens revealing concerns around epistemic exclusion, ecological disconnect, institutional opacity, technical failures, and weak relational reciprocity.

Distinguishing between general mistrust (broader concerns about digital agriculture) and particular mistrust (based on direct experience), the authors identify five categories—epistemic, ecological, institutional, practical, and relational. These show that scepticism is rooted in informed critique and historical experience, not ignorance.

The findings challenge techno-optimist narratives and highlight the need for co-development, transparency, and systems responsive to ecological and social complexity. Mistrust is framed not as absence of trust, but as a productive force for more accountable and sustainable agricultural innovation.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Pesticide-free agriculture: Is a third way possible besides organic and conventional agriculture?

Publication date: 18/02/2026

Rés0Pest implemented cropping systems that excluded all pesticide use, including seed treatments, while maintaining synthetic fertilizer inputs. The systems were co-designed through participatory methods, following a system experiment approach that evaluates the effects of a combination of cropping practices and their interactions on cropping system performance over the long term. Results showed that in pesticide-free systems, it is possible to achieve yields comparable to conventional and higher than organic systems and, in some cases, generate higher net farm income. Pest and pathogen crop damage did not significantly increase over time, although weed management remained a key challenge. These findings suggest that technically and economically viable pesticide-free arable systems are possible under certain conditions, and that new solutions are needed to support their adoption across a wider range of contexts.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Genetically Modified Microorganisms: Risks and Regulatory Considerations for Human and Environmental Health

Publication date: 14/02/2026
Advances in affordable genetic engineering have accelerated the creation and large-scale environmental release of genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs). While beneficial applications exist, GMMs may present unique, long-term risks to human and environmental health. Unlike static chemicals, GMMs are biologically active, self-replicating entities capable of rapid mutation and global dispersal. Current regulatory frameworks place responsibility on each country to regulate GMMs, without a clear, coordinated international policy. This review details critical risk scenarios, including horizontal gene transfer to native species and the possible disruption of vital human microbiomes (gut, oral, and infant), which could increase resistance to degradation, promote traits that expand a microbe’s range of hosts or ecological niches, and enhance the production of novel metabolites with unexpected biological activity. In soil, GMMs may support the emergence of “super bugs” or destabilize carbon sequestration cycles, potentially impacting climate resilience. Engineered microbial enzymes in the food supply may also act as environmental drivers of autoimmunity. Given the limited understanding of microbial ecology, we propose a decision-based biosafety workflow emphasizing pre-release risk assessment and continuous post-release monitoring. We urge national and international regulators to adopt the precautionary principle to better protect human health and the environment from the potential negative outcomes of GMMs.
Resource type: article: Web Page

Emerging trends in genome editing of wild animals

Publication date: 06/02/2026

This paper maps emerging trends in genome editing of wild animals, finding that current projects mainly focus on population control and de-extinction, with fewer targeting threatened species. It examines four key dimensions: the technology itself, conservation practices, research organization, and governance and policy.

Despite its potential, key questions remain—especially whether genome editing can increase genetic diversity without unintended impacts. It also calls for ecosystem-wide assessments, case-by-case evaluation, and post-release monitoring. The field is largely driven by private funding, with limited involvement of local and Indigenous stakeholders, potentially weakening inclusion and transparency. Finally, there is an urgent need for more adequate regulation, as environmental release of genome-edited animals challenges existing nature protection laws and GMO frameworks.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Emerging governance considerations for the deployment of genetically engineered microbes

Publication date: 01/02/2026

This review examines emerging trends in the governance and policy landscape for real-world deployment of genetically engineered microbes (GEMs) in the United States and Europe. A recent wave of commercialized GEMs in the US suggests renewed interest in open release after decades of low activity, with applications spanning agriculture, environmental restoration, energy, and health.

These developments challenge existing governance frameworks in several ways. The feasibility of strict product- or process-based regulation is increasingly tested, while the long-term persistence and ecological action of GEMs complicate traditional risk assessment approaches. Synergistic and indirect impacts are difficult to predict, requiring methods that can address high levels of uncertainty.

At the same time, diverse applications and new business models—such as direct-to-consumer approaches—raise concerns around stewardship, consent, transborder movement, and monitoring. Addressing these issues will require interdisciplinary research and broader stakeholder deliberation to support more robust and adaptable governance.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Genome editing outside of controlled facilities: A review of plausible futures and risks

Publication date: 01/01/2026
Vectors for delivering proteins and/or nucleic acids into the cells of whole organisms, from single to multicellular, are rapidly advancing. Common cargos are nucleic acids needed to express the components of a genome editing reaction, or ribonucleoproteins (RNP) that can act immediately upon delivery. In only 20 years, improvements in associated formulation technologies have decreased the dependence of genome editing on the need for a laboratory or trained personnel, allowing for genome editing outside of controlled facilities. As this happens, both target and non-target organisms may be exposed to active biological agents, necessitating a new framework for risk assessment. Some scientists deny developments for gene editing in uncontrolled environments, leading to scientifically unjustified dismissals of risk.
Resource type: article: Web Page

Governing by imaginaries? Regulatory legitimization of genome-edited foods in Japan

Publication date: 23/12/2025

The article examines how Japanese regulators construct legitimacy around genome-edited foods by shaping dominant sociotechnical imaginaries through strategies like selective incorporation, technocratic reinterpretation, and deferral, which tend to depoliticize societal concerns. While governance is presented as scientifically sound and procedurally transparent, public responses express alternative views based on precaution, social inclusion, and consumer rights, revealing ongoing tensions between innovation goals and demands for democratic legitimacy, and showing that this apparent stability is still fragile and contested.

Resource type: article: Web Page

Is gene editing natural and does it matter? A qualitative analysis of citizen-consumers’ and farmers’ views on the use of new genomic techniques in plants

Publication date: 23/12/2025

This study examines the notions of ‘naturalness’ in Finnish citizen-consumers’ and farmers’ perspectives, through ten focus group discussions, on genetic modification (GM) and new genomic techniques (NGTs) in plant breeding, amidst the current European Union (EU) legislative changes. In this context, the study shows that citizen-consumers’ views on GM plants and NGTs are significantly associated with different notions of ‘naturalness’ that are closely entangled with each other. Some citizen-consumers consider any human intervention as unnatural and unacceptable, while others are open to NGTs if they resemble natural processes or traditional breeding methods. Those who do not explicitly make use of the notion of naturalness are the most open towards all genetic techniques. However, consideration of the use purpose of NGTs can shift views of citizen-consumers. Farmers, in contrast, focus less on naturalness and more on the practical and economic implications of NGTs. Organic farmers expressed concerns about being excluded from the benefits of NGTs. Despite some caution towards transgenesis, most farmers were open to using NGTs due to the pressing challenges they face, such as climate change and economic pressures. The study concludes that different understandings of (un)naturalness are inextricably linked and continuously shape each other, rather than existing independently. This dynamic interdependence, in turn, underlie shifting views of NGTs in different contexts.

Resource type: article: Web Page